PodcastsNachrichtenVerdict with Ted Cruz

Verdict with Ted Cruz

Premiere Networks
Verdict with Ted Cruz
Neueste Episode

1066 Episoden

  • Verdict with Ted Cruz

    BONUS: Daily Review with Clay and Buck - Apr 14 2026

    14.04.2026 | 1 Std.
    Meet my friends, Clay Travis and Buck Sexton! If you love Verdict, the Clay Travis and Buck Sexton Show might also be in your audio wheelhouse. Politics, news analysis, and some pop culture and comedy thrown in too.

    Here’s a sample episode recapping four takeaways. Give the guys a listen and then follow and subscribe wherever you get your podcasts.

    Clay is Optimistic

    Clay Travis highlights what he sees as clear economic momentum under President Donald Trump, noting that the Iran naval blockade appears to be working as intended, with crude oil prices falling and both the S&P 500 and Dow Jones Industrial Average pushing toward record highs. Clay emphasizes that listeners who avoided panic during recent geopolitical tensions and tariff scares are being rewarded, as retirement accounts and 401(k)s are rebounding strongly—underscoring a recurring theme of market confidence and economic stability tied to Trump’s policies.

    The hour then pivots to one of the most dramatic political collapses in recent memory: the downfall of California Congressman Eric Swalwell. Clay and Buck explain that Swalwell, once a leading favorite to become California’s next governor, has now not only withdrawn from the governor’s race but has also resigned his congressional seat amid escalating allegations of sexual misconduct and criminal behavior. The hosts stress how extraordinary the speed and severity of the collapse is, noting that Swalwell had survived previous scandals—including connections to a suspected Chinese spy and constant media exposure—only to see his career end just weeks before early voting in California’s June primary. They also note that a Republican congressman in Texas has stepped down around the same time over unrelated allegations, pointing to a broader moment of political reckoning around misconduct.

    Sen. Rand Paul on Everything

    A wide‑ranging interview with Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky, who offers a constitutional critique of the U.S. military action against Iran. Paul reiterates that while he opposes Iran obtaining nuclear weapons, he believes Congress must authorize war and questions claims of imminent threat. He discusses the risks of escalation in the Strait of Hormuz, the economic impact of rising energy prices, and the uncertainty of whether negotiations can truly resolve the conflict. Paul also weighs in on Kentucky politics, strongly endorsing Congressman Thomas Massie as a constitutional conservative, emphasizing fidelity to the Constitution over unquestioning loyalty to any single political figure.

    The conversation broadens into Second Amendment rights, where Senator Paul argues for national constitutional carry, citing data showing lawful gun owners commit crimes at significantly lower rates than the general population. Drawing on his personal experience during the 2017 congressional baseball shooting, Paul criticizes gun‑free zones and inconsistent state laws that disarm law‑abiding citizens while leaving criminals unchecked. He also addresses the SAVE Act and voter ID, arguing that voter identification should be a basic requirement for elections and criticizing mass mail‑in voting systems that weaken confidence in electoral integrity.

    Two Can Play at That Game

    A continued focus on the U.S.–Iran conflict, as Clay and Buck note signs of de‑escalation: the S&P 500 is within a half‑percent of an all‑time high, crude oil has fallen sharply to around $88 a barrel, and gas prices appear to be stabilizing after early war‑related spikes. They explain that markets are signaling confidence that President Trump’s blockade strategy and pressure campaign are working, with Iran’s leverage shrinking and expectations growing that further negotiations—possibly in Pakistan—could follow. Buck frames the standoff as a waiting game, describing Iran’s threats in the Strait of Hormuz as “economic terrorism” and highlighting comments from Vice President JD Vance that the United States can outlast Tehran economically and militarily.

    The conversation then pivots back to the Eric Swalwell scandal, which dominates much of Hour 3. Clay plays extended audio from Lana Drews, the newly public accuser who alleges Swalwell drugged and violently raped her in a West Hollywood hotel room, choking her into unconsciousness. The hosts stress that this accusation is separate from and more severe than earlier reporting, helping explain why Swalwell abruptly resigned from both his gubernatorial race and Congress. They analyze the rapidly expanding fallout, including viral videos allegedly showing Swalwell in compromising situations, and public denials from figures like Senator Ruben Gallego, who had previously endorsed Swalwell but is now scrambling to distance himself. Clay and Buck argue the scandal is triggering a broader reckoning within Democratic circles, as journalists and politicians who long protected Swalwell now appear to be running for cover.

    This Will Make You Laugh

    An in‑studio interview with Sarah Isgur, SCOTUSblog editor, Advisory Opinions podcast host, and author of Last Branch Standing. Isgur challenges popular narratives about the Supreme Court, arguing that the Court is wrongly blamed for decisions that Congress refuses to make. She explains why the Court is not simply a “6–3 partisan body,” and how Congress’s abdication of legislative responsibility has forced the judiciary into the political spotlight. Clay and Buck ask about rumors that Justice Samuel Alito may retire, with Isgur explaining why the odds are roughly 50‑50 and how President Trump could shape the Court again if a vacancy opens this summer.

    Isgur also unpacks internal Supreme Court dynamics, particularly tensions surrounding Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, describing her as less institutionalist and more inclined toward solo dissents—traits that can strain collegial relationships. She previews several high‑impact cases still pending this term, including Voting Rights Act redistricting disputes, birthright citizenship, election‑day ballot deadlines, and Remain in Mexico–style immigration authority, emphasizing that many of these controversies should ultimately be resolved by Congress, not the Court.

    Make sure you never miss a second of the show by subscribing to the Clay Travis & Buck Sexton show podcast wherever you get your podcasts! ihr.fm/3InlkL8

    For the latest updates from Clay and Buck: https://www.clayandbuck.com/

    Connect with Clay Travis and Buck Sexton on Social Media:
    X - https://x.com/clayandbuck
    FB - https://www.facebook.com/ClayandBuck/
    IG - https://www.instagram.com/clayandbuck/
    YouTube - https://www.youtube.com/c/clayandbuck
    Rumble - https://rumble.com/c/ClayandBuck
    TikTok - https://www.tiktok.com/@clayandbuck

    YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@VerdictwithTedCruz
    See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
  • Verdict with Ted Cruz

    BONUS POD: What Did Democrats Know—and How Long Did They Protect Eric Swalwell

    14.04.2026 | 11 Min.
    1. Core Allegations Against Eric Swalwell
    Multiple women (at least four) have accused Congressman Eric Swalwell of sexual misconduct, ranging from inappropriate contact and explicit messages to sexual assault and rape.
    One allegation reportedly involves a 2024 incident in New York, which the document says is under prosecutorial review.
    Swalwell is described as denying the most serious allegations while admitting to “mistakes in judgment” and resigning from Congress to avoid being a distraction.
    2. Alleged Political Cover-Up by Democrats
    Democratic leadership allegedly knew about Swalwell’s behavior for years or decades and actively protected him.
    The party only abandoned Swalwell once he became a political liability, particularly due to concerns about California gubernatorial politics.
    His removal is framed as strategic damage control, not a moral reckoning.
    3. Ongoing Investigations
    House Ethics Committee – Alleged misconduct involving a staffer.
    Manhattan District Attorney – Review of a 2024 sexual assault allegation.
    California Local Prosecutors – Reviewing possible criminal conduct.
    Department of Homeland Security (DHS) – Investigating alleged visa violations involving a nanny.
    4. Nanny / Campaign Finance Controversy
    Separate from misconduct allegations, Swalwell is accused of: Employing a nanny after her visa allegedly expired.
    Paying her improperly or “under the table.”
    Using campaign funds for personal childcare expenses.

    These claims originated from a complaint filed by a controversial figure, raising credibility concerns.
    Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the The Ben Ferguson Show Podcast and Verdict with Ted Cruz Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening
    X: https://x.com/benfergusonshow
    YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@VerdictwithTedCruz
    See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
  • Verdict with Ted Cruz

    No Deal: Trump Moves to Blockade the Strait of Hormuz as Iran Defies Nuclear Demands plus Swalwell Bombshell

    13.04.2026 | 38 Min.
    1. U.S.–Iran Conflict Escalation
    Negotiations with Iran failed after roughly 20 hours because Iran refused to abandon its nuclear ambitions.
    In response, President Trump is described as ordering a U.S. naval blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, framing it as a decisive measure to prevent Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons and to stop what is portrayed as Iranian “extortion” of global shipping.
    The blockade is economic warfare, aimed at cutting off Iran’s oil exports, which are depicted as the backbone of the Iranian economy.
    2. Strategic and Economic Impact of the Strait of Hormuz
    Shutting down the Strait is portrayed as: Crippling Iran financially, by halting oil exports.
    Pressuring China, described as the primary buyer of Iranian oil.
    Stress-testing Europe, which is characterized as reluctant to confront Iran directly but still vulnerable to energy shocks.

    The U.S. control of global sea lanes (“Pax Americana”) gives America leverage over international commerce.
    3. Trump Administration’s Policy Framing
    The Trump approach is: Having clear “red lines”: no uranium enrichment, no nuclear weapons, open shipping lanes, and an end to terror financing.
    Using maximum pressure before full-scale war, with the blockade portrayed as an intermediate step between diplomacy and total military escalation.

    Success is defined primarily as preventing Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons, with regime collapse described as a desirable but secondary outcome.
    4. Criticism of Prior U.S. Policy
    The Biden administration is heavily criticized for: Not enforcing existing sanctions, allowing Iranian oil exports to rebound.
    Enabling the growth of a so‑called “ghost fleet” transporting Iranian oil, mainly to China.

    The argument presented is that this enforcement lapse indirectly funded terrorist groups aligned with Iran.
    5. Internal U.S. Political Commentary
    Democrats are: Opposing or undermining U.S. military actions for partisan reasons.
    Failing to support allies and projecting weakness internationally.

    Western Europe is depicted negatively, while Eastern Europe and Middle Eastern allies are portrayed as more supportive of U.S. actions.
    6. Eric Swalwell Allegations (“Bombshell”)
    A major secondary storyline focuses on Congressman Eric Swalwell: Multiple allegations of sexual misconduct, including assault, by former staffers.
    A criminal investigation reportedly opened in New York.

    Swalwell withdrawing from the California governor’s race is framed as: A political calculation by Democrats to limit electoral damage.
    Evidence of alleged hypocrisy, with claims the party protected him until it became politically inconvenient.

    Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson and The Ben Ferguson Show Podcast Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening
    YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@VerdictwithTedCruz/
    Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/verdictwithtedcruz
    X: https://x.com/tedcruz
    X: https://x.com/benfergusonshow
    YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@VerdictwithTedCruz
    See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
  • Verdict with Ted Cruz

    No Man Left Behind Morale Booster, Pentagon Manual Wrecks the Left’s Talking Point & Temporary Protected Status Equals Permanent Consequences Week In Review

    11.04.2026 | 32 Min.
    1. Military Morale and Leadership
    U.S. military morale has significantly strengthened by a commander-in-chief who is willing to risk substantial resources to rescue a single American service member.
    Trump is contrasted against Clinton (Somalia), Obama (Libya), and Biden (Afghanistan), portraying those administrations as failing to protect troops.
    The U.S. military ethos: soldiers fight aggressively because they trust that medics, rescue forces, and leadership will risk everything to save them.
    2. U.S. Military Culture and “Quiet Math of American Violence”
    Highlight inter-service respect (Marines, Navy corpsmen, Air Force PJs).
    American combat effectiveness comes not just from training or equipment, but from certainty that help will arrive under fire, reinforcing battlefield courage.
    3. Trump’s Iran Policy and Deterrence Strategy
    Trump’s foreign policy is: “FAFO” (forceful consequences for aggression)
    Transactional with allies (support is conditional)

    Infrastructure strikes are: Intended to cripple military and economic capability
    Designed to pressure the population to overthrow the regime
    A deliberate choice not to destroy oil infrastructure to preserve post‑conflict recovery potential

    4. War Crimes Accusations and Legal Defense
    Democrats and media figures are labeling infrastructure strikes as “war crimes.”
    This is countered by citing the Pentagon’s Law of War Manual, arguing that power generation and infrastructure supporting military operations can be lawful military objectives.
    5. View of Iranian Leadership
    Iran’s rulers are theocratic extremists who: Do not care about civilian suffering
    Are willing to sacrifice large portions of their population

    Doubts are expressed about whether economic devastation would deter or influence regime behavior.
    6. Immigration and Violent Crime
    Violent crimes committed by undocumented immigrants are widespread and underreported
    Democratic policies (sanctuary cities, TPS, opposition to ICE) directly enabled these crimes

    Several specific criminal cases argue that border enforcement failures have led to American deaths.
    Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson and The Ben Ferguson Show Podcast Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening
    YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@VerdictwithTedCruz/
    Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/verdictwithtedcruz
    X: https://x.com/tedcruz
    X: https://x.com/benfergusonshow
    YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@VerdictwithTedCruz
    See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
  • Verdict with Ted Cruz

    How The Iran War Ends, Talking to Astronauts & Illegals Keep Committing Crimes

    10.04.2026 | 34 Min.
    1. Iran Military Conflict
    The U.S. has conducted a 39–40 day military campaign against Iran that resulted in a decisive and generational defeat of Iran’s conventional military.
    Assertions include the destruction of Iran’s air defenses, missiles, drones, navy, air force, and military leadership, and thousands of U.S. strikes.
    President Trump announced a two‑week ceasefire, contingent on Iranian compliance.
    Three demands for Iran: Zero uranium enrichment
    Surrender of enriched uranium stockpiles
    Keep the Strait of Hormuz open

    Democrats are undermining the effort by labeling it a potential “quagmire” and accusing Trump of war crimes.
    Trump’s willingness to escalate further (e.g., bombing power plants or bridges) if Iran violates ceasefire terms.
    2. U.S. Politics and Media Framing
    Democrats and media are prioritizing opposition to Trump over national security.
    Repeated theme that Democrats allegedly: Downplay Iranian terrorism
    Protect adversaries of the U.S.
    Undermine American military success

    3. Artemis II Space Mission
    Highlights Artemis II as the first human mission to orbit the Moon since Apollo.
    Four astronauts are returning after a nine‑day mission in the Orion capsule.
    Emphasizes inspiration, technological achievement, and national pride.
    Artemis program goal: Return humans to the Moon by 2028
    Land the first woman on the Moon
    Establish sustained human presence and a future lunar base

    Frames the Moon mission as a strategic competition with China, especially over lunar south pole resources.
    Stresses bipartisan cooperation in space policy and Congressional funding protections.
    4. Illegal Immigration and Crime
    Argues that Biden-era immigration policies allowed violent criminals into the U.S.
    Several high-profile murder cases are involving illegal immigrants.
    Illegal border crossings have dropped dramatically under Trump.
    Accuses Democrats are: Supporting sanctuary policies
    Opposing ICE enforcement
    Prioritizing illegal immigrants over U.S. citizens

    Raises terrorism concerns, citing arrests of foreign nationals entering the U.S. illegally.
    Frames immigration as a central midterm election issue and public safety crisis.
    Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson and The Ben Ferguson Show Podcast Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening
    YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@VerdictwithTedCruz/
    Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/verdictwithtedcruz
    X: https://x.com/tedcruz
    X: https://x.com/benfergusonshow
    YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@VerdictwithTedCruz
    See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Weitere Nachrichten Podcasts

Über Verdict with Ted Cruz

Join Senator Ted Cruz and co-host Ben Ferguson as they break down the most important news stories of the day and reveal what they mean for you. On "Verdict with Ted Cruz,” you will go behind the scenes of the political debates that define our country. "Verdict with Ted Cruz" is being brought to you by Jobs, Freedom, and Security PAC, a political action committee dedicated to supporting conservative causes, organizations, and candidates across the country. In 2022, Jobs, Freedom, and Security PAC plans to donate to conservative candidates running for Congress and help the Republican Party across the nation.
Podcast-Website

Höre Verdict with Ted Cruz, Was jetzt? und viele andere Podcasts aus aller Welt mit der radio.at-App

Hol dir die kostenlose radio.at App

  • Sender und Podcasts favorisieren
  • Streamen via Wifi oder Bluetooth
  • Unterstützt Carplay & Android Auto
  • viele weitere App Funktionen

Verdict with Ted Cruz: Zugehörige Podcasts

Rechtliches
Social
v8.8.9| © 2007-2026 radio.de GmbH
Generated: 4/14/2026 - 11:02:56 PM