Parliament Matters

Andy Burnham has unveiled his ministerial team. So, we assess what his appointments reveal about the Government’s priorities, the political calculations behind them, and the parliamentary tests that lie ahead.

We begin with the appointment of the new Chief Whip, Anneliese Midgley MP, who takes on one of Westminster’s toughest jobs despite having just two years’ parliamentary experience and no experience on the front bench.

We also consider the return of familiar faces to Cabinet, the promotion of newer MPs, the creation of a Cabinet-level role for artificial intelligence, and the implications of the reshuffle for select committees, the House of Lords and the Opposition front benches.

Andy Burnham has also reorganised the machinery of government. Professor Jon Davis, Professor of Government at King’s College London, joins us to explain why changes to Whitehall departments matter, how they shape decision-making at the heart of government, and why reorganising government can have consequences that last long after individual ministers have moved on.

With Parliament now in summer recess, Ruth and Mark also recommend a selection of political books to keep you entertained over the holidays – whether you’re heading for the beach, relaxing in the garden or simply taking shelter from the latest heatwave.

Although Parliament is taking a break, Parliament Matters isn't. Keep an eye on your podcast feed throughout August for several special episodes. Unless Parliament is recalled or major political developments demand an emergency edition, we'll return with our regular weekly analysis when Parliament reconvenes in September.
____

🎓 Learn more using our resources for the issues mentioned in this episode.

❓ Send us your questions about Parliament:

✅ Subscribe to our newsletter.

📱 Follow us across social media @HansardSociety / @hansardsociety.bsky.social

£ - Support the Hansard Society and this podcast by making a donation today.

Parliament Matters is a Hansard Society production supported by the Joseph Rowntree Charitable Trust.

Presenters: Mark D’Arcy and Ruth Fox
Producer: Richard Townsend
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Following the murder of Ann Widdecombe, we reflect on the dangers facing those in Parliament and public life. Earlier this year, former Lord Chancellor Sir Robert Buckland was appointed to lead the independent review into the circumstances surrounding the murder of Sir David Amess MP, examining whether any opportunities to prevent his death were missed. He joins us to discuss the risks facing politicians today, what more can be done to improve their safety, and how those protections can be strengthened without undermining the close relationship between MPs and the constituents they serve. We also look back at Ann Widdecombe's parliamentary career, including her memorable appearance at the Hansard Society's 2009 House of Commons Speaker election hustings, where she demonstrated the wit, independence and commitment to Parliament that defined her public life.

As Sir Keir Starmer names 26 new Peers, we examine the future of the House of Lords. This week, the Hansard Society hosted the first major speech by the Lord Speaker since his election earlier this year. In a wide-ranging address, he warned of the constitutional risks of embarking on poorly conceived reform of the Upper House, describing the Lords as a "constitutional trip switch" capable of forcing a rethink of flawed legislation that has not received adequate scrutiny in the Commons. Anyone seeking to rewire the system, he argued, must consider whether a reformed second chamber would continue to provide that safeguard – or instead "blow a constitutional fuse". We also discuss the newly published report on Retirement and Participation in the House of Lords, which proposes a phased mandatory retirement age, requiring all Peers to retire at 80 by 2034, alongside a minimum participation requirement that could see inactive members removed from the House.

And with the new Burnham Government expected to emerge from its chrysalis next week, we ask whether the House of Commons should have postponed its summer recess to scrutinise the incoming Prime Minister. We explore the constitutional mechanics and political realities of appointing a new Government and consider what Parliament's priorities should be when MPs return in September to begin holding the new administration to account.
___

🎓 Learn more using our resources for the issues mentioned in this episode.

❓ Send us your questions about Parliament:

✅ Subscribe to our newsletter.

📱 Follow us across social media @HansardSociety / @hansardsociety.bsky.social

£ - Support the Hansard Society and this podcast by making a donation today.

Parliament Matters is a Hansard Society production supported by the Joseph Rowntree Charitable Trust.

Presenters: Mark D’Arcy and Ruth Fox
Producer: Richard Townsend

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Nigel Farage has quit the House of Commons to force a by-election in his constituency. In a blistering attack on what he called the media “pile-on” and a political stitch-up by the Westminster establishment, he insisted that the “people of Clacton should be the judge of my actions.”

So, this week we dissect his “resignation” statement and ask whether he has a point. Is Farage the victim of an establishment determined to bring him down, or is he simply struggling under the weight of mounting scrutiny? We compare his case with other high-profile political controversies and examine whether his arguments stand up.

We also explain what his departure means for the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards’ investigation into his conduct. We explore the standards process, why the investigation is now paused, what happens if Farage wins or loses the by-election, and the range of possible outcomes if the investigation resumes.

Just before we began recording, Andy Burnham sent Labour MPs a lengthy leadership pitch promising a different style of government: a stronger voice for backbenchers, a more collaborative approach to policymaking, changes in the approach of the Whips' Office, and a renewed focus on Parliament itself. We analyse what he's proposing and what it might mean in practice.

Plus, we sit down with Labour MP Alex Sobel, Chair of the Fair Votes All-Party Parliamentary Group, to discuss his bid to amend the Representation of the People Bill to establish a National Commission on Electoral Reform. He explains why he believes proportional representation is essential to restoring trust in British politics, assesses the prospects for winning Labour over to electoral reform, and argues that the Government should go even further than the Rycroft Review recommendations to tighten the rules on political donations.
____

🎓 Learn more using our resources for the issues mentioned in this episode.

❓ Send us your questions about Parliament:

✅ Subscribe to our newsletter.

📱 Follow us across social media @HansardSociety / @hansardsociety.bsky.social

£ - Support the Hansard Society and this podcast by making a donation today.

Parliament Matters is a Hansard Society production supported by the Joseph Rowntree Charitable Trust.

Presenters: Mark D’Arcy and Ruth Fox
Producer: Richard Townsend

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

With a new Prime Minister preparing to take office and the Commons appointing its first female Clerk, we discuss these two pivotal appointments that will help shape how Parliament works in the years ahead. We explore the challenges they will face in managing Parliament, examine fresh warnings from the Lord Speaker that Westminster’s restoration plans risk stalling for lack of political support, and hear from Baroness Hayter about her bid to close a loophole in the lobbying laws.
______

As Sir Keir Starmer prepares to hand over power to Andy Burnham, attention is turning to the shape of the incoming government. Beyond the headline Cabinet appointments, who will take on the key parliamentary management roles in No 10 and the Commons – and why do those choices matter?

Meanwhile, speculation continues that former Foreign Secretary David Miliband could return to his old job in government, but this time from the House of Lords.
If so, how could MPs scrutinise a Foreign Secretary who cannot speak in the Commons? Ruth and Mark revisit proposals considered when David Cameron held the post and ask whether Parliament is any closer to resolving the problem.

The Commons has also announced its first female Clerk of the House. Eve Samson will take up the role in October as the Commons’ most senior official. We trace her clerkly career and look at the formidable challenges awaiting her, from supporting MPs through political change to overseeing one of Westminster’s biggest institutional headaches.

The headache is, of course, the Restoration and Renewal of the Palace of Westminster. The Lord Speaker, Lord Forsyth, has warned that there is no political consensus – across parties or both Houses - to support the scale and cost of the programme. But in a letter published this week he highlights the “eye-watering” costs of delaying decisions about the renovation programme.

Finally, while the bill to legalise assisted dying continues to dominate attention, there are many other Private Members Bills starting their journey through Parliament.

Among them is one from the Labour peer Baroness Hayter, who wants to close a loophole in lobbying rules. She joins the podcast to explain why reform is needed and what she hopes her Bill will achieve.

____

🎓 Learn more using our resources for the issues mentioned in this episode.

❓ Send us your questions about Parliament:

✅ Subscribe to our newsletter.

📱 Follow us across social media @HansardSociety / @hansardsociety.bsky.social

£ - Support the Hansard Society and this podcast by making a donation today.

Parliament Matters is a Hansard Society production supported by the Joseph Rowntree Charitable Trust.

Presenters: Mark D’Arcy and Ruth Fox
Producer: Richard Townsend

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

What would an Andy Burnham government actually look and feel like? This week we explore how Andy Burnham might govern, drawing on his experience as a Cabinet minister, his time as Mayor of Greater Manchester, and his own writings on constitutional reform. We ask whether a Burnham government would take a fundamentally different approach to Parliament – particularly the use of the party whip – and what that could mean for MPs and the balance of power at Westminster. We also explore why dozens of Presentation Bills were introduced this week, how this legislative procedure works, and whether any of these bills have a realistic chance of becoming law.
_________

Andy Burnham has long been a critic of the parliamentary whipping system, arguing that it concentrates power in too few hands and weakens the role of elected MPs. Could a Burnham government take a more relaxed approach to party discipline? Might MPs be given greater freedom to represent their constituents, or would the realities of governing quickly outweigh the case for reform? Drawing on newly published research by parliamentary rebellions expert Professor Philip Cowley, we explore what parliamentary management might look like under a Burnham premiership.

The parliamentary whip is about far more than securing votes in the division lobbies. Might it allow greater scope for MPs with relevant expertise or constituency interests to serve on legislative committees, invest more in the pastoral management and wellbeing of Labour MPs, and place greater emphasis on career development and job satisfaction within the Parliamentary Labour Party? Could a Burnham government take a more collegiate approach to these responsibilities? Or would the practical demands of governing mean that traditional methods of party management prevail?

We also turn our attention to one of Westminster’s lesser-known legislative procedures: Presentation Bills. These are bills that are often never debated and, in some cases, are never even drafted. While they rarely become law, they provide MPs with a valuable opportunity to raise the profile of an issue, signal political intent, and build support for future reform. We discuss how MPs use Presentation Bills strategically, what they can – and cannot – achieve, how many have become law in recent years, and why they remain an important part of an MP’s parliamentary toolkit.
____

🎓 Learn more using our resources for the issues mentioned in this episode.

❓ Send us your questions about Parliament:

✅ Subscribe to our newsletter.

📱 Follow us across social media @HansardSociety / @hansardsociety.bsky.social

£ - Support the Hansard Society and this podcast by making a donation today.

Parliament Matters is a Hansard Society production supported by the Joseph Rowntree Charitable Trust.

Presenters: Mark D’Arcy and Ruth Fox
Producer: Richard Townsend
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.