Fallout continues this week from Jeffrey Epstein’s death, which has now been officially ruled a suicide. Where’s his longtime confidante, Ghislaine Maxwell, who’s widely suspected of participating in a conspiracy to sex traffic girls for him? She’s been missing or at least she hasn’t been in public. Those photos of her at an In-N-Out Burger in the Valley? They appear to be fake. Josh and Ken talk about those dupes and if they were likely to have misled the Feds. Should we assume the government is looking for her in the first place? And, despite Epstein’s death, would a case against Maxwell be harder to prosecute than people think? What about the will he signed two days before he died?
Plus: accountability in the Epstein saga, an IRS analyst pleads guilty to leaking financial records to Michael Avenatti, and long suffering federal judges and what happens when they get angry and hit ‘reply all.’
What happens next in the Epstein investigation
Jeffrey Epstein was found dead in his cell at the Manhattan Correctional Center on Saturday, as he awaited trial. What happens next in the investigation? Attorney General Bill Barr said the Department of Justice would still come after his co-conspirators. What happens to his estate and his assets?
Plus: your questions about emoluments and if anyone has standing to sue President Trump for an emoluments clause violation, the latest in former White House Counsel Greg Craig’s trial, Peter Strzok and Andrew McCabe are suing over their firings, it looks like Jacob Wohl did a bad thing, and Michael Avenatti and Ken White exchanged some words this weekend.
The House still isn’t moving to impeach the president, but House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerry Nadler said *if* his committee *were* to proceed in that direction, articles of impeachment could pass his committee in the late fall. Nadler cited key court decisions about the committee’s efforts to obtain evidence and witnesses coming in October or November. But: is there a need for more fact-finding?
Ken and Josh take some questions from listeners on impeachment and the new California state law requiring candidates to release their tax returns to get on the ballot.
Judge Amy Berman Jackson’s in a tough spot with Roger Stone. The judge ordered Stone off all social media a few weeks ago, and now he’s suing, saying it’s a violation of his First Amendment rights. Does he have a good argument? On the other side, the lawyers for the government have asked Judge Jackson if they can show a clip of The Godfather Part II to make a point to the jury.
Plus: Judge Emmett Sullivan and the emoluments case, and is Michael Avenatti a good presidential candidate?
Nope, it’s still not RICO.
This week, a federal judge dismissed a lawsuit brought by the Democratic National Committee, which had alleged that the Russian Federation engaged in a RICO conspiracy with Donald Trump, the Trump campaign, Paul Manafort, Julian Assange, Roger Stone and others. RICO, of course, is the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (as you ATPL listeners already know). It’s a law designed to allow prosecutions and lawsuits aimed at the mafia and others who operate criminal enterprises.
Of course, there really was a Russian government-backed hack of DNC email servers and the information obtained in the hack really was released in an effort to benefit the Trump campaign. So why didn’t this lawsuit work?
Plus: California Governor Gavin Newsom signs into law a requirement candidates release their tax returns to get on the ballot. Let the legal arguments begin. President Trump continues to preemptively fight Congress seeking his tax returns under a New York state law. Jerry Nadler has a weird press conference about seeking grand jury materials from the Mueller investigation. Is this the beginning of an impeachment inquiry? And, is Larry Klayman a good lawyer?
It’s Finally Mueller Time
At long last, members of the House Judiciary and Intelligence Committees got to question special counsel Robert Mueller about his investigation of President Trump and Russian interference in the 2016 election. Special guest former prosecutor Renato Mariott spoke with host Josh Barro about whether the little that Mueller said was noteworthy. Mariotti says Mueller was trying to be very careful with his words because he did not want to say something that could become a soundbite. One thing Mueller did talk about was why he did not subpoena President Trump during the investigation. And in spite of the statute of limitations on certain crimes, Mueller did leave the door open for a possible indictment once Trump leaves office.