Valuetainment

Democrats are already preparing an aggressive oversight campaign against President Donald Trump and his administration if they win control of the House in the November midterms. Robert Garcia and Jamie Raskin are laying out plans to investigate Trump, his family, financial dealings, foreign influence, pardons and other controversies, while keeping impeachment on the table.

Andrew Wilson challenges Candace Owens over her claims about Erica Kirk and Turning Point USA during a heated discussion surrounding the death of Charlie Kirk.Owens explains why her views of Erica Kirk changed after their meeting, points to what she describes as inconsistencies in Erica Kirk’s public statements, and questions the investigation into Charlie Kirk’s death. Wilson pushes back, repeatedly asking Owens to explain what she means when she describes Erica Kirk as “complicit” and what evidence supports that claim.

Candace Owens and Andrew Wilson debate the theory that an explosive may have been involved in the death of Charlie Kirk. The discussion examines video footage of the shooting, the movement of Charlie Kirk’s clothing, and comments from former Navy SEAL Rob O’Neill, who said the footage looked like an explosion to him.

Candace Owens and Andrew Wilson clash over the Charlie Kirk case as Owens challenges Wilson on his knowledge of the charges against Tyler Robinson. The debate gets heated as Owens presses Wilson to identify the seven charges and argues that understanding the specific allegations is essential before claiming the evidence against Robinson is overwhelming.

Candace Owens and Andrew Wilson clash over claims surrounding the Charlie Kirk investigation, including a disputed claim about Lance Twigs’ DNA and the rifle allegedly connected to the case.During the debate, Owens acknowledges that she previously misinterpreted testimony regarding DNA profiles found on the rifle and clarifies that the testimony did not establish that Lance Twigs’ DNA was on the gun. Wilson presses her on the correction and challenges her broader approach to evidence and claims surrounding the case.