Top 8: The Single Arm Studies and What are the Alternatives?
I’m excited to reshare one of our most-played conversations—the one where Norwegian regulator/HTA leader Anja Schiel and I get very practical about when single-arm trials fail decision-makers and what comparative, smarter alternatives look like for regulators, HTA bodies, payers, clinicians, and—most importantly—patients.
--------
45:32
--------
45:32
Top 7: How to work with a physician within Pharma to become a valuable partner
As statisticians in pharma, one of the most important professional relationships we can build is with our physician colleagues. When this partnership works well, studies run smoother, decisions are better, and our impact for patients grows.
In this all-time Top 7 replay, Benjamin Piske and I talk about what makes this collaboration effective, the challenges you may face, and how to establish yourself as a true partner rather than “just the statistician.”
--------
26:40
--------
26:40
Top 6: What is EU HTA and why should statisticians care?
This is one of our most downloaded episodes ever, and I’m excited to bring it back in this replay. In this conversation, I spoke with Lara Wolfson (MSD) and Anders Gorst-Rasmussen (Novo Nordisk) about EU HTA (European Union Health Technology Assessment): what it is, why it’s coming, and why statisticians like us must pay attention.
If you’ve ever wondered whether your approach to safety analysis is leading to misleading conclusions, this episode is a must-listen.
--------
36:08
--------
36:08
Top 5: The analysis of adverse events done right
We’re bringing back one of our most downloaded episodes ever – a deep dive into how adverse events should be analyzed properly. This conversation with Jan Beyersmann and Kaspar Rufibach is packed with methodological insights and practical implications for statisticians working in clinical trials.
Adverse event (AE) analysis has long been approached differently from efficacy analysis, often using overly simplistic methods that can bias results. In this episode, we discuss why that’s a problem – and how the SAVVY collaboration (Survival analysis for AdVerse events with Varying follow-up times) is pushing the field forward.
Together with academia and multiple pharma companies, this collaboration tackled the issue of AE analysis using real randomized trial data, not just simulations. The findings show how common methods can underestimate or overestimate event probabilities and how established statistical methods can be applied more consistently to ensure fair benefit–risk assessments.
If you’ve ever wondered whether your approach to safety analysis is leading to misleading conclusions, this episode is a must-listen.
--------
52:45
--------
52:45
Replay: R vs SAS - which is the better tool in pharmaceutical research
In this special replay of one of our all-time most popular episodes, we dive deep into one of the most debated topics in the pharmaceutical industry: R vs SAS.
Together with Thomas Neitmann and my co-host Sam Gardner, we compare these two powerful statistical programming tools from multiple angles — ease of learning, day-to-day usability, community support, visualization capabilities, regulatory acceptance, and more.
Whether you are a seasoned SAS programmer, an R enthusiast, or someone deciding which tool to focus on, this conversation will give you valuable insights into where each shines, where they struggle, and how the industry is evolving.
Über The Effective Statistician - in association with PSI
The podcast from statisticians for statisticians to have a bigger impact at work. This podcast is set up in association with PSI - Promoting Statistical Insight. This podcast helps you to grow your leadership skills, learn about ongoing discussions in the scientific community, build you knowledge about the health sector and be more efficient at work. This podcast helps statisticians at all levels with and without management experience. It is targeted towards the health, but lots of topics will be important for the wider data scientists community.